AI Roles For Collective Learning

AI Roles For Collective Learning

Future Directions

Time

Spring 2025

Tags

# AI Pedagogy

# Learning Design

# Concept Development

My role

Researcher and concept designer - Individual project

Audience

Educators, learning designers

Time

Spring 2025

Tags

# AI Pedagogy

# Learning Design

# Concept Development

My role

Researcher and concept designer - Individual project

Audience

Educators, learning designers

Reinterpreting AI roles: From individuals to communities.

Reinterpreting AI roles: From individuals to communities.

Designed a conceptual framework for class-level AI use in higher education. Instead of focusing on AI as an individual study tool, this project reinterpreted AI as a support for collective learning and proposed four class-facing roles: Community Scribe, Inquiry Case Generator, Debate Challenger, and Peer Collaborator. The framework draws on Community of Inquiry and recent research on AI, engagement, and collaborative learning.

Context

The project began from a gap in current AI use. Students use AI heavily for individual academic work, faculty use it more selectively for preparation, and classroom integration remains limited. The presentation frames this as an opportunity to design AI for real-time, class-level learning rather than only individual support.

Process

  • Synthesized research on student AI use, faculty adoption, engagement, and collaborative learning to identify a class-level design gap.

  • Used Community of Inquiry as a framing model to reinterpret AI roles beyond individual support.

  • Built a conceptual map linking AI roles, learning mechanisms, and possible outcomes.

  • Developed four class-facing roles: Community Scribe, Inquiry Case Generator, Debate Challenger, and Peer Collaborator.

  • Created scenario-based applications to show how each role could operate in real classroom activities.

Problem

Most AI use in education still centers on personalization for individual learners. This leaves less attention to collaboration, community-building, peer learning, and class-level progress, even though those are central to many learning experiences.

Deliverables

  • Conceptual framework for collective learning with AI

  • Role map connecting individual, hybrid, and community-level AI roles

  • Four class-facing AI roles

  • Scenario-based classroom applications

Outcomes

Produced a future-facing framework that reframed AI from an individual support tool to a class-level learning design question. The project translated theory into a set of usable roles and classroom scenarios, with Inquiry Case Generator standing out as a model for using AI to introduce productive struggle and shared inquiry.

Reflection

This project pushed me to think about classroom AI as a space for both course learning and AI literacy. It also reinforced that future-facing design is not only about adding new tools, but about deciding how those tools should support learning goals, participation, and shared classroom experience. A remaining question for me is evaluation: how we would know whether class-facing AI roles truly improve learning.

Context

The project began from a gap in current AI use. Students use AI heavily for individual academic work, faculty use it more selectively for preparation, and classroom integration remains limited. The presentation frames this as an opportunity to design AI for real-time, class-level learning rather than only individual support.

Process

  • Synthesized research on student AI use, faculty adoption, engagement, and collaborative learning to identify a class-level design gap.

  • Used Community of Inquiry as a framing model to reinterpret AI roles beyond individual support.

  • Built a conceptual map linking AI roles, learning mechanisms, and possible outcomes.

  • Developed four class-facing roles: Community Scribe, Inquiry Case Generator, Debate Challenger, and Peer Collaborator.

  • Created scenario-based applications to show how each role could operate in real classroom activities.

Problem

Most AI use in education still centers on personalization for individual learners. This leaves less attention to collaboration, community-building, peer learning, and class-level progress, even though those are central to many learning experiences.

Deliverables

  • Conceptual framework for collective learning with AI

  • Role map connecting individual, hybrid, and community-level AI roles

  • Four class-facing AI roles

  • Scenario-based classroom applications

Outcomes

Produced a future-facing framework that reframed AI from an individual support tool to a class-level learning design question. The project translated theory into a set of usable roles and classroom scenarios, with Inquiry Case Generator standing out as a model for using AI to introduce productive struggle and shared inquiry.

Reflection

This project pushed me to think about classroom AI as a space for both course learning and AI literacy. It also reinforced that future-facing design is not only about adding new tools, but about deciding how those tools should support learning goals, participation, and shared classroom experience. A remaining question for me is evaluation: how we would know whether class-facing AI roles truly improve learning.

AI Roles For Collective Learning

What this project shows

  • Designing AI for collective learning

  • Translating theory into classroom approaches

  • Proposing future-facing learning roles

Faculty Gender And Inclusivity

Modular, Skills-Based Learning