Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT in Learning
Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT in Learning
Project Delivery
Time
Spring 2025
Tags
# Data Analysis
# AI In Education
# Student Research
My role
Researcher - Individual project
Tools
R, Quantitative analysis, regression modeling, robust standard errors
Audience
Researchers, educators, higher education stakeholders
Time
Spring 2025
Tags
# Data Analysis
# AI In Education
# Student Research
My role
Researcher - Individual project
Tools
R, Quantitative analysis, regression modeling, robust standard errors
Audience
Researchers, educators, higher education stakeholders
Turning a large public dataset into a testable study of how students perceive ChatGPT’s learning value
Turning a large public dataset into a testable study of how students perceive ChatGPT’s learning value
Designed and completed a quantitative research study using a large international higher education dataset to examine whether students who perceived ChatGPT as more capable also reported greater learning and academic enhancement.
Context
AI tools are widely used in higher education, but their educational value remains debated. Beyond adoption rates, this project focused on whether students’ perceptions of ChatGPT’s capabilities were associated with how much they believed it supported their learning.
Problem
Evidence on AI in education often emphasizes usage, while offering less insight into how students’ beliefs about ChatGPT relate to their perceived learning benefit.
Process
Framed a research question using a large public higher education dataset
Built composite variables to measure perceived capabilities and perceived learning enhancement
Applied regression models to test the relationship between the two constructs
Added control variables to strengthen interpretation
Checked assumptions and used robust standard errors to improve analytic rigor
Deliverables
Research paper
Outcomes
Completed a full quantitative study from research question to model interpretation, while connecting theory, measurement, and statistical analysis. The study also generated practical implications for understanding how students perceive the learning value of ChatGPT in higher education.
Reflection
Research supports project delivery by turning broad questions into evidence that can guide planning. In this case, the analysis helped move conversation about ChatGPT from general interest toward clearer design and implementation considerations.
Context
AI tools are widely used in higher education, but their educational value remains debated. Beyond adoption rates, this project focused on whether students’ perceptions of ChatGPT’s capabilities were associated with how much they believed it supported their learning.
Problem
Evidence on AI in education often emphasizes usage, while offering less insight into how students’ beliefs about ChatGPT relate to their perceived learning benefit.
Process
Framed a research question using a large public higher education dataset
Built composite variables to measure perceived capabilities and perceived learning enhancement
Applied regression models to test the relationship between the two constructs
Added control variables to strengthen interpretation
Checked assumptions and used robust standard errors to improve analytic rigor
Deliverables
Research paper
Outcomes
Completed a full quantitative study from research question to model interpretation, while connecting theory, measurement, and statistical analysis. The study also generated practical implications for understanding how students perceive the learning value of ChatGPT in higher education.
Reflection
Research supports project delivery by turning broad questions into evidence that can guide planning. In this case, the analysis helped move conversation about ChatGPT from general interest toward clearer design and implementation considerations.
Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT in Learning
What this project shows
Framing research questions from public data
Connecting theory and analysis
Interpreting findings with caution
EdX Course QA And Maintenance
Faculty Gender and Inclusivity